- sikre målopfyldelse og politik implementering
- opsamle læring og sikre justeringer
- skabe reflektion og grundlag for forandring
- vise gennemsigtlighed, accountability og compliance
- dokumentere effekter og resultater
Hanne Lund Madsen har gennemført en række interne reviews og flere eksterne og uafhængige audits og evalueringer for internationale og nationale opdragsgivere. Hun er rutineret indenfor professionelle evalueringsmetoder og har en stor indsigt i gennemførelsen af impact assessments. Ligeledes har hun erfaring med enkle og fleksible design af monitorerings systemer i organisationen. Evalueringspraksis bygger på internationale evalueringsstandarder og gennem flere meta-reviews af internationale evalueringsrapporter er hun i front med "state of the art" indenfor evaluering og auditing.
I kvalitative evalueringer lægges der vægt på brug af Appreciative Inquiry samt på aktivt ejerskab, aktiv deltagelse og anvendelse under hele evalueringsprocessen. Evaluering ses som eet forandringsværktøj i sig selv.
Referenceliste
- Evaluation of the Global Human Rights Strengthening Project, HURIST, (UNDP).
- Global Thematic Review of Children’s Right to Education Programme, Save the Children Sweden.
- Review of Regional Rights Resources Team, Fiji, Pacific. (UNDP)
- Review of mainstreaming of cross-cutting objectives in Danida Programming, (Danida).
- Evaluation of the Pilot Project “Human Rights and Poverty Reduction, UNDP/BIM, Macedonia (The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute)
- Evaluation of Food First Action Network International, FIAN. (SIDA, Bread for the World, Misereor)
- Evaluation of the Global Minority Rights and Development Programme (Minority Rights Group International)
- Review of Human Rights Studies Centre, Peshawar, Pakistan. (NORAD)
- Consultative Review of the International Commission of Jurists, Geneva. (ICJ / Novib)
- Pre-appraisal of Human Rights Project Proposals in Malawi. (Danida)
- Review of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Malawi. (DFID & Danida)
- Synthesis of Evaluation Results within Main Aid Sectors; Human Rights, Agriculture, Health, Environment and Education and Training in the period 1990-1997. (DanChurchAid)
- Review of International Child Rights Programme with case studies in Bangladesh, Uganda and Guatemala. (Red Barnet / Save the Children)
- Review of the African Union for Human Rights, Burkina Faso. (Novib)
- Review and Planning Mission, Justice, Peace and Reconciliation Programme, Kenya. (DanChurchAid)
- Consultative Review, Organisation Mondiale Contre la Torture. (OMCT & Oxfam/Novib)
- Policy Evaluation – the Human Rights Policy of Novib. (Oxfam/Novib)
- Evaluation of the International Human Rights Organisation; HURIDOCS, Geneva. (SIDA, MFA Finland, NORAD)
- Review of Access to Justice Programme, AGHS, Pakistan. (NORAD)
- Pre-evaluation, Cliniques Juridique, Association Nigerienne de Droit de l’Homme, Niger. (Caritas/Danida)
- Review and Strategy Planning, the Separated Children in Europe Programme, SCEP. (Save the Children, Sweden)
- Synthesis and Significance of Results, Phase II, Danish Children & Youth Network, Copenhagen.
- Monitoring of Presidential and Local Elections, OSCE/ODIHR, Macedonia.
Following a competitive process, the Oslo Governance Centre recruited Hanne Lund Madsen to develop a report with recommendations on how the new ‘Democratic Governance Analysis and Learning Unit’ could be operationalised. The report presents findings and observations emanating from a complicated consultation process with major stakeholders within UNDP, and it also provides suggestions on approaches based on what other similar institutions have developed. The report will be a key instrument in the planning process for the Democratic Governance Group in 2010-11 and onwards.” (Bjørn Førde, Director, UNDP Governance Centre).
It is a very well written report where the scope of the ToR is covered. Moreover, the pedagogic approach makes the evaluation a useful tool for Sida’s co-operation with FIAN. (Sida, Stockholm)
FIAN-International welcomes the draft report “Evaluation of FIAN”, December 2004. It is written in a precise manner and contains food for thought for the organisation as it draws relevant conclusions and gives recommendations for our work and for the discussions on necessary changes. The whole evaluation process was seen by FIAN as extremely helpful. The interplay between the internal debates and the external evaluation proves to be very productive in getting a focussed and sharp analysis of strengths and weaknesses of FIAN and for the direction of possible change. (Director, FIAN-International, Germany)
Thank you for a good meeting as always. It is a very good report, which delivers according to TOR. (Anne Mette Danielsen, Coordinator, Children and Youth Network, Denmark)
Once again thanks for an excellent and comprehensive report, which we think, we can use in many ways. With this report we feel well prepared to undertake our next steps and to seek new funding and new donors and we will of course send the report to our partners as documentation of where AC is at present. (Vibeke Tuxen, Head of International Department. AC International Child Support)
